Below, are a few examples of astrophotography images Ive taken with lenses of varying focal lengths. Most small refracting telescopes start in the 300 to 400 mm focal length range, and even these are classed as widefield telescopes. The shot of the cat could certainly be improved through cropping, though. The Canon 135mm f/2 is no less impressive on a full-frame camera. it is crisp, fast, and awsome. I think prime users get too used to the idea of bokeh as the only answer. Canon 135 mm is really E X T R A O R D I N A R Y lens. Stage photography is another good use for the 135 L. Based on my handful of experiences with this lens in the backyard, I have found these traits to hold true. She's cold? But when holes in text prompt me to look at the work of the writer, there is nothing professional there either. Unfortunately it is not manufactured in a multicoated version, and produces prominent internal reflection artifacts on very bright stars. I don't know about other photographers but I do not have many applications for this focal length. (purchased for $1,625), reviewed January 27th, 2010 I really don't want to count all the pores - and the hairs coming out of them (eeeew!) Not rude at all, a fair comment. Ive set the f-stop to F/2.8, to sharpen up the stars a bit. As a complete beginner in Astrophotography should I buy Rokinon 135mm lens or Canon EF 75-300mm lens with Canon EF 50mm lens? The aesthetic quality of the blur in the out-of-focus parts of the image are buttery smooth and soft. Because of chromatic aberration, no telephoto lens can be used at full aperture. Neutral yet very nice colours. Aperture ring. The 135 f/2 is not perfect. It always happens to me with Samyang, it makes good glasses, fast and sharp, I want to have them, but they are not comfortable to use, not in Sony E, their focus is not precise, and they are not "so" cheap. I find 400gm as the tolerable weight limit for a lens on my panasonic gx85, and I am guessing following telephoto lenses would satisfy the itch to get good bokeh shots, 1. Flip on through what we found, and see how the lens performs in the real world in our sample gallery. The Canon EF 135mm f/2L USM Lens makes an excellent indoor sports lens. Canon EOS 60Da with the Rokinon 135mm F/2 lens. Now i have the f2.8 version, and while the resolution is better it s under no circumstance as good as the f/4 one.
Samyang 135 f/2 ED astrophotography modifications - astrojolo FULL FRAME TELEPHOTO 135mm F2.0 Particular properties of modern 135/2 lenses are resolution with e.g. Target for bortle 9 astrophotography? 85 Is a different story, my 85 gets used a lot. If canon puts an IS on this lens, it would be perfect! Try to have eyes and nose / lips all in focus. He loves photography, and runs a YouTube channel with tutorials, lens reviews and photography inspiration. I just purchased a very lightly used Canon 200mm F2.8L II USM for $620 from a great online dealer and can't wait for an opportunity to try it out with my Astronomik CLS clip on a T4i at a dark site. And yet this review is on front page of DPReview prompting me to go and buy this lens -- so surely it must be a professional , well grounded review, right? image quality wise it is by far one the sharpest lenses ive ever used. You currently have javascript disabled. With a good smartphone, some creative legwork, and the photos scaled down as they are in this article you can make photos that at least just as good. AF is accurate and very fast. Definitely now on my to-buy list. (Dpreview), Use the 500 Rule to find the Perfect Exposure Length for Astrophotography, Use a DSLR Ha Filter for Astrophotography, AstroBackyard | Astrophotography Tips and Tutorials2023, Optical Construction: 11 Glass elements in 7 Groups. Rokinon 135mm F2.0 ED Lens. We think it rises to the challenge. I am not really looking at buying anything else, though. Oh yes, and it leads to lusting after other primes! This article was originally published on Micael's blog, and is being republished in full with express permission. Also, as creative as the wide-field 135mm focal length is, its not practical for smaller DSOs and most galaxies. Rain or shine, it's hard to find a camera that does all the OM-5 can for the price. Thanks, The inset picture is a magnified view of the bottom right corner of the frame. Nikon 300/4 ED IF, Sigma 50/2.8 DG Macro (not a telephoto, but good).
Samyang/Rokinon 135mm F2 for Astrophotography: Review - YouTube To fit the Heart and Soul Nebulae in a single frame requires an extremely wide field of view (compared to the magnification of most telescopes). I shoot it wide open 90% of the time. He's better than I am on BS, I got to give him that. I've missed shots at wide apertures because the DOF is so extremely thin. It is the lens I use as a reference point to compare all new lens acquisitions to after purchase to determine if they need to be returned for repair or replacement. In this post, Ill explain why I think the Rokinon 135mm F/2 is the perfect addition to an arsenal of astrophotography lenses. It could really use an update to its coatings. This summer I'm going to try the lenses out for LRGB images to see how they perform. IS is useful in my f/4 zooms but I don't need it to hand-hold this lens. The duck and cat are really the only good shots. i too use the 135mm nikkor[ with a MB speed booster on fuji x for outstanding separation], also a samyang 85 mm 1.4 nikon mt with speedbooster also gives excellent separation, yes, I think I have read that the old Nikkor 135mm f3.5 was even sharper than the f2.8. Got it! For some reason Samyang makes lenses nobody is asking for. OTOH you can now get a 70-180 f2.8 zoom that weights virtually the same and is only a tiny bit longer (Tamron's on E mount, like 20mm longer than the AF SY or most other modern 135s), and there's lighter than ever 85/1.4s (eg Sigma's DN for L/E mount) that can achieve a very similar look while coming in at 600g, tho at an even higher price. I'll take photo of Orion as soon as possible. But first, there are several general rules which must be understood. There is no doubt that the 135L deserves it excellent reputation for image quality. 1. After weeks with a production Fujifilm X-T5, Chris and Jordan have some final thoughts. I see that many commenters did not get what this lens can do. Do I wish it were manufactured with metal? In photoshop I love to zoom 200, 300 and even 400% to see the extreme details it is an absolutely amazing lens, great backround blur, great for low light weddings with available light. I've owned a few L lenses and while their USM motors have always been quick to snap in focus, this 135mm is on a different level. From my purchase research, I found a consensus that stopping down optimizes sharpness but the diaphragm will make nine diffraction spikes when stopped down. This is the EF-M series version. Only con I can think of, and that may be a big one depending on how you plan to use the lens is the lack of weather sealing. The lens hood is removable (and reversible), which makes packing the Rokinon 135mm away into the included lens pouch possible. So now your 42Mpix A7rII is only a 10.5Mpix. The 70-200 f2.8 L2 and he 400f5.6 will however set you back way more than $1.100. Now I wonder why people are never happy even on 3rd day of a new year :) Come on guys just think "Micael Widell" was working over holiday period to publish this free article ;). We've combed through the options and selected our two favorite cameras in this class. This way you get both lenses with only one! We have come to accept that most lenses are strong in only one or two of these three factors, that I personally focus on when researching lenses to buy. I would love to see his test images. Even if the background is very close to your subject, somehow the optical construction in the 135mm lens will still manage to separate the background beautifully. I have compared many times my 135/2 against my 100/2.8 and there is a big difference. Really like the large focusing ring. Focus throw. Barney and Chris have been shooting the new Sony 50mm F1.4 GM, and we have a bunch of full resolution samples for you to peruse. The F/2.0 maximum aperture of the Rokinon 135mm lens offers a chance to collect a serious amount of signal in a single shot. It improves slightly stopped down. The 5D's larger pixels also make chromatic aberration somewhat lower at most apertures. Well saturated but neutral. f1.4 was a necessisty rather than a creative luxury. The foolproof image seems to be more a case of how a bright fuzzy cluttered moving background can completely detach from the offset dark subject matter and overwhelm it. Interesting. Now, I have to admit that up to this point, it sounds a little too good to be true. If you want the best value possible for your money, and can survive without autofocus, buy the Samyang. If so, which one? The Rokinon 135mm F/2.0 ED UMC is one of the most affordable and practical lenses for astrophotography on the market. If I got this lens, would it make more sense long term to get the Canon mount with a E mount adaptor so I could fit it more easily to a dedicated astro camera later? 24/28mm, 50mm, 100mm, 200mm. I stopped reading after the part where someone I don't know told me I "should" be doing something. There was no reason to test any other because, when stopped down to 49mm, F6.1, this lens is simply perfect, comparable to any APO on the market. It's March, and in America that means it's time to start arguing over which college athletics team is the best at basketball. Agreed. Well, for me. Canon CR-N700 4K PTZ Camera with 15x Zoom. The APO showed no chromatic aberration at all with the addition of the Astronomik UV/IR cut clip filter (passing 380-680nm), but the telephoto lenses, even when stopped down, showed a tight bright red ring around all stars. You are entitled to your opinions, and I respect that! Contrasty, saturated, nice colours. This is one of my all time favourites. Focal length is great. (purchased for $890), reviewed October 21st, 2005 F2 allows higher shutter speeds in lower light without raising the ISO. Deep-sky astrophotography is often associated with a camera and telescope, but the truth is there are a lot of great camera lenses for astrophotography out there. Chris referred to the Canon RF 16mm F2.8 STM as 'a little gem'! Yes, she's isolated. Large emission nebulae like the California Nebula (pictured below) are a great choice for this focal length. :). At 135mm, you can get really creative about the object or objects you shoot and where you position them within the frame. Photography is art and technology, the latter serving the first.Photography is not something arty with a lot of gadgetry.
Literally it means "blur" so you could just as well use the dictionary definition below the top match from Google search: Bokeh - the visual quality of the out-of-focus areas of a photographic image, especially as rendered by a particular lens. I also tested 200 f/2.8 tele and it is one of the most perfect lens in existence, as well as the 135. What I am trying to avoid is spending another $1,100 on a quality APO, and instead using my existing Nikkor 180mm ED lens with a Baader-modified Canon 450D that I just obtained. I liked the extra versatility of the zoom and the ability to shoot at 200mm. And you can even crop a 135 efl with today's sensors should you actually need it. Required fields are marked *. It seems they are now quite comparable in quality to prime lenses. Really excels as indoor sports lens on a crop camera. The lenses I selected are all affordable prime lenses, easily available on the second-hand market, and adaptable to the EOS system. Optics quality, sharp,very special picture, sharpness, clarity, weight, fast, accurate AF (fringe benefit of f/2), price, no IS, makes you regret buying any zoom lenses, compact, very sharp wide open, good color contrast, bokeh, this is the lens. It is NOT extremely sharp wide open, it often requires massive AF adjustment on DLSRs (sometimes beyond what the body allows as micro-adjustment) and AF is not reliable enough to consistently ensure sharp focus at full aperture. I do not think telephoto lenses would be suitable for use with your modified camera. modest cost for "L" series, wonderful optics and fast speed, nitpicking, but not a circular aperature and no weather sealing. Also, the newer and much more expensive 200mm F4 SMC Pentax with the K mount is decisively inferior, showing small but annoying red chromatic aberration. All of them are extremely sharp and produce mouth-watering bokeh, and all of them are reasonably priced for what you get. Whereas quality apochromats can be corrected with broad band filters, such as the Astronomik UV/IR cut filter or the CLS-CCD filter, telephoto lenses can not. Due to the weight, at times I didn't move my shooting position and just zoomed to a composition that worked. Valerio, I sold my Canon Lens because in Nikon Lens there is a Defocus control option, very usefull in a daylight photos, as portrait. My copy has very stiff manual focus though and is quite heavy. Fit and finish are first-rate as well, with very smooth manual focus operation, and very fast autofocus on the camera. The flawless image quality is only half the story though. Now I have only the Nikon but I can try to take a photo of the same subject fully open Hey! Cost. Rudy, why didn t you include any L lenses from canon? You would be hard pressed to find any other lens on a full frame camera that produces creamier bokeh. You got a criticism fine say it politely, and too the point. Its fast f/2.0 maximum aperture is effective in low light and enables shallow depth of field control. (Suggesting that diffraction limiting is only part of the story with lens softness at tiny apertures.). No one yet mentioned a zoom lens, I had an opportunity to test my Canon 24-105L f/4 on M31 Andromeda Galaxy and received wonderful results with Canon 60D unmoded, I set it to 105mm, No vignatting, slight coma on the corners and no false color on bright stars. Great post; thanks for the detailed information. I had of course heard that this lens is supposed to be very sharp, but I had never before had such a full blown "wow" experience when reviewing the sharpness of a lens. How's that for an endorsement? (purchased for $890), reviewed July 17th, 2006 Do you expect me to gawk? You can also find him as @mwroll on Instagram and 500px. Testing on an EOS-5D, we see that it's sharpness is almost as good wide open in the corners as on the EOS-20D with its smaller sensor. If you don't like that article that's your right as a member. Moreover if we have a serendipitous moment regarding a new (or used) lens, that's a good thing. Most of these APOs have F ratios around 6.5, and are unable to comprehend in their field of view large celestial objects such as the Andromeda galaxy, the North America nebula, and comets. Again, there's no context. One of my very best lenses! When i check a F stop chart, i see 15 stops if i count the main, and the secondary ones: 2, 2.4, 2.8, 3.3, 4, 4.8, 5.6, 6.7, 8, 9.5, 11, 13, 16, 19, 22. Thanks.. or.. Clear Skies! The finish and texture of the Rokinon 135mm F/2 is a step up from the 14mm F/2.8 I ordered a few years ago. Why so salty? I can only guarantee that the TSAPO65Q would work very well. Some people like these, and consider them decorative. I love the lens for my modified Sony a6000!
Target for bortle 9 astrophotography? - Beginning Deep Sky Imaging A specialist lens, at best, though I did enjoy the cat image. SIx months on from buying it this has become my favourite lens ever, beating my previous favourite (Leica's 4th version of the 35mm Summicron for its M-series rangefinders). A coupe of stage shows, one very recent, and a random collection using this lens exclusively Otherwise, on FF body this lens is wonderful. I already did some trials with the Samyang 12mm lens. I dont mean to be rude, but I fail to see any photographic comparison or test to display the quality of this lens against others, concerning coma or anything else, except considerations on the manual focusing, its shape and ergonomic. (37% is difference, so you get little more, about 15.5Mpix) ". Another thing that makes people go "wow" over the 135mm F2 lens design is the bokeh, which can be so creamy that distant backgrounds almost render as gradients. sigh, overdone bokeh and centre sharpness bear little relevance to the art of this hobby. Manually focusing a lens for astrophotography is nothing new, but the manual aperture ring adjustments may feel a little strange at first. The Samyang 135mm f/2 lens is very wide in astrophotography terms. Most of the available 135mm F2 lenses have a very short minimum focusing distance in relation to the focal length, creating a magnification ratio of around 0.2 - 0.25. Zeiss Jena or Oberkochen? Micael Widell is a photography enthusiast based in Stockholm, Sweden.